Cannot borrow self as mutable
WebУ меня есть struct, содержащий два поля и я хочу модифицировать одно поле (mutable borrow), используя другое поле (immutable borrow), но получаю ошибку от чекера borrow. Например, следующий код:... WebDec 14, 2024 · This would allow you to call cache.get more than once: fn get (&mut self, buf: &std::vec::Vec) -> Option<&StringObject>. But the returned value will maintain exclusive the borrow of self until dropped. So you wouldn't be able to use the result of the first call after you made the second call.
Cannot borrow self as mutable
Did you know?
WebJan 20, 2024 · If you are not bound (for some reason) to structure the code the way it is, we can move the update logic within Node#update to work around the borrow checker and eliminate impl MoveAction. impl Node { fn update (&mut self) { for action in self.actions.iter () { self.x = action.dest_x; self.y = action.dest_y; } } } WebFeb 10, 2024 · 1. The closure passed to the get_or_insert_with method in Option is of type FnOnce - it thus consumes or moves the captured variables. In this case self is captured because of the usage of self.get_base_url () in the closure. However, since self is already borrowed, the closure cannot consume or move the value of self for unique …
WebJul 25, 2024 · self.get_lat () borrows a value from &self, and that will restrict what else you can do with self until that borrow is released – when your last goes out of scope at the end of the function. If the compiler allowed you to call add_child, this could invalidate the immutable reference you have. WebApr 12, 2014 · I searched online for similar problems and I cannot seem to grasp the problem here. I am from a Python background. The full error: hello.rs:72:23: 72:35 note: previous borrow of `self.history[..]` occurs here; the immutable borrow prevents subsequent moves or mutable borrows of `self.history[..]` until the borrow ends
WebOct 2, 2024 · You can only borrow mutable variables as mutable and self is by default immutable, so either you need to make the function take mut self (as is suggested by the compiler) or make a new variable that is mutable (as in your original code). – SCappella Oct 2, 2024 at 3:24 self is not mutable since I passed it as immutable in the inputs. Web11 hours ago · Teams. Q&A for work. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. Learn more about Teams
WebFeb 16, 2024 · Unlike the question Cannot borrow `x` as mutable more than once at a time, add does not return any reference at all. Unlike the question Borrow errors for multiple borrows, the return type is i32 which has 'static lifetime. While the following code can be compiled without errors.
WebDec 2, 2024 · Cannot borrow `*x` as mutable because it is also borrowed as immutable; Pushing something into a vector depending on its last element; Why doesn't the lifetime of a mutable borrow end when the function call is complete? How should I restructure my … diamond and pearl wedding ringsWebFeb 11, 2024 · This is Rust doing what Rust is designed to do: prevent you from using memory in an unsafe way. A mutable reference to self.bars was borrowed and given to an implicitly-created std::slice::IterMut value (the iterator the loop is using). Because of this, self can't be mutably borrowed within the loop -- it contains self.bars, which is already … diamond and peridot ringsWebIf you want to borrow the return without forcing the mutable borrow to live that long too, you are probably going to have to split the function in two. This is because you are not able to borrow the return value from the mutable borrow to do so. Share Improve this answer Follow edited Apr 19, 2024 at 21:35 Shepmaster 372k 85 1069 1321 diamond and pink sapphire bandcircle k easy rewards card numberWebMar 15, 2024 · Cannot borrow "values" as immutable because it is also borrowed as mutable The problem is fundamentally the same -- a function that takes a mutable reference and returns an immutable reference causes the mutable borrow to exist as long as the immutable reference returned continues to exist, which is why you can't invoke … circle k easy pay reset pinWeb在這里, getBars返回對self.bars的引用,它是一個包含生命周期'a的字符串切片的容器。 到目前為止,一切都很好。 但是, &self.bars的生命周期是多少? 它對應於self的生命周期(即各自的FooStruct )。 self的壽命是多少? 它是'self (隱含的生命周期)。 circle k easy pay register cardWebNov 19, 2024 · true_response holds a reference to Response, which means that as long as true_response exists, you cannot do a mutable borrow of Response, which is required by write_response. The issue is basically the same as in the following, hopefully simpler example ... fn write_response (self: &mut Response, true_response: &Response) diamond and pink sapphire earrings