S v litako and others 2014
SpletS v Litako AND Others 2014 (2) SACR 431 (SCA) Citation 2014 (2) SACR 431 (SCA). Case No 584/. [2014] ZASCA. Court Supreme Court of Appeal. Judge Navsa JA, Ponnan JA, … SpletIn Litako the court found that section 3 did not overrule an existing common law rule, which is that the extra curial statement of an accused (whether an informal admission or a …
S v litako and others 2014
Did you know?
http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/2024/158.html Splet06. okt. 2014 · S v Litako 2014 SACR 431 (SCA): A clarification on extra curial statements and hearsay August 2015 · Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse …
SpletThe appellant’s appeal against conviction succeeds. 2. The conviction of the appellant of robbery with aggravating circumstances, and the sentence imposed by the court a quo in respect of the appellant (Accused 1 in the court a quo), are set aside and substituted with a finding of ‘Not Guilty’. ...
SpletIf any one of the elements (the act, wrongfulness, fault, causation, or harm) isabsent, there can be NO delictual liability. Strict liability (see footnote 12) only findsapplication in a … Splet01. jun. 2024 · The Supreme Court of Appeal (‘SCA’) in Litako & others v S 2014 (2) SACR 431 (SCA) para 64 (‘ Litako ’s case’) rejected the approach adopted in Ndhlovu ’s case, and reiterated the rule excluding the use of extra-curial statements made by one co-accused against another.
Splet16. jun. 2015 · S v LITAKO AND OTHERS 2014 (2) SACR 431 (SCA) Evidence — Admissibility — Hearsay evidence — Admissibility of in terms of s 3 of Law of Evidence Amendment Act 45 of 1988 — Extra-curial confession or admission of one accused inadmissible against other accused.
SpletIn Litako the court found that section 3 did not overrule an existing common law rule, which is that the extra curial statement of an accused (whether an informal admission or a … blockfrost ipfshttp://www.saflii.org.za/za/cases/ZANCHC/2009/18.html block functionalismSplet08. maj 2009 · The Appellant, who was unrepresented at the trial, had been convicted on two counts of rape and sentenced to 15 years imprisonment on each the said charges (i.e. 30 years imprisonment in total) and he was granted leave to appeal to this Court on petition as long ago as 20 May 2005. blockfront youtubeSplet03. avg. 2010 · [Show full abstract] Litako & others v S 2014 (2) SACR 431 (SCA) para 64 (‘Litako’s case’) rejected the approach adopted in Ndhlovu’s case, and reiterated the rule … blockfront ww2 severhttp://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2024/29.html free building games like minecraftSplet25. avg. 2015 · In Litako the court found that section 3 did not overrule an existing common law rule, which is that the extra curial statement of an accused (whether an informal … free building ggSpletS v Litako AND Others 2014 (2) SACR 431 (SCA) - LDEL3714 - UFS UV - StuDocu source: south african criminal law reports, the (1990 to listing of cases january 1990 to august 2: … free building games in roblox